Ancient art throughout the catacombs of Rome, painted on the walls and carved into stone coffins, shows Jesus as he multiplies loaves of bread, heals the sick and brings the dead back to life. These images are unified by one surprising element: In each of them, Jesus appears to brandish a wand. That led scholars to wonder: Did ancient Christians see Jesus as a magician?
Despite these evocative images, most evidence suggests early Christians didn’t see Jesus as a magician. Magic was considered a purely human pursuit that could not raise the dead, whereas Jesus’ supernatural acts were always seen by believers as miracles performed through a powerful God. What’s more, the “wand” carried by Jesus was in fact not a wand —magicians of the day never carried wands anyway, experts told Live Science.
Magic and early Christianity
Still, magic was very much alive during the period of early Christianity. Between the third and eighth centuries, the years when images of what looks like a “wand-carrying” Jesus Christ adorned the burial sites of ancient Romans, Christianity was still in its infancy, existing alongside ancient Judaism as well as Roman gods and goddesses, said Lee Jefferson, the chair of the religion program at Centre College in Danville, Kentucky. “Even at the time of some of these images, they don’t have an agreed upon Bible; they don’t have a canon; they don’t have an agreed upon understanding about who Jesus is,” Jefferson told Live Science.
That said, it looked nothing like the magic we see in pop culture today. Magic centered around spells, which people would seek from magicians to deal with problems in their everyday lives, from sickness to love. Patrons of magicians took those spells home to recite, just like we would take medicine home from the doctor. Recite it wrong, and it wouldn’t work.
In a time of uncertainty, when people had little control over whether their crops survived and sickness was often a death sentence, magic provided a sense of control. That said, magic was looked down upon by Jews and polytheists alike, Jefferson said. Magic was seen as superstitious and it was banned in the Roman Empire. Although people continued to practice it in private, religious leaders saw it as shameful, Jefferson wrote in the book “The Routledge Handbook of Early Christian Art” (Routledge, 2018).
In this context, some people did call Jesus a magician — but as a form of slander. At the time, polytheist religious leaders saw Christianity as a form of superstition, like magic. “I mean, here’s this group that gets together in the morning and drinks wine and says it’s blood and eats bread and says it’s flesh,” Jefferson said. “You can probably understand why people thought it was superstitious.” The philosopher Celsus, a vocal critic of Christianity, was among those who saw Jesus as a magician.
But followers of Jesus never saw it that way. Their savior performed miracles, not magic — powerful acts of God that often defied death, very different from the human pursuit of magic, that dealt with small matters. “You would not want your demigod to be called a magician because it makes them seem less powerful,” Jefferson said.
Jesus’ ability to defeat death, heal people and produce food and drink elevated him above Roman gods in the eyes of Christians and non-Christians alike, said Felicity Harley-McGowan, an art historian at Yale Divinity School. They believed Jesus had a particular power over death and would invoke his name as a way of harnessing that power, even as they invoked the names of other gods. Roman gods could heal and raise the dead, but none performed these acts directly or with the agency of Jesus. For example, Asclepius, the god of healing, healed people through dreams; Jesus healed directly with his hands. While Asclepius was killed for raising the dead, Jesus was praised for it. Early Christian art reflects that preoccupation with miracles, and less focus on his story of suffering and redemption. For instance, though dozens of paintings exist of Jesus carrying what looks like a wand and raising Lazarus from the dead, relatively few early paintings depict Jesus’ last supper or crucifixion, Jefferson wrote in a 2020 article published in the journal Biblical Archaeology Review.
Related: 8 alleged relics of Jesus of Nazareth
So why is Jesus depicted carrying an object that looks so much like a magic wand? Scholars tend to agree that “wand” isn’t the best term to describe it. In fact, the tool probably wasn’t associated with magic at all — it just appears that way to us, because it’s filtered through the lens of modern conceptions of wizards, such as Harry Potter. In the earliest years of Christianity, magic didn’t involve wands. No known artwork from that time period depicts magicians carrying them, Jefferson added. Instead, many scholars prefer the term “staff” to describe the object.
Regardless, the fact that Jesus carried a staff in these images does hold its own significance. In the earliest years of Christianity, people would have been familiar with Moses — a Jewish prophet and another miracle-worker — but not necessarily with Jesus. That staff connected Jesus to Moses, who also carried one and in fact performed miracles with it. “He’s kind of like a new Moses,” Jefferson said.
The staff was a symbol of power people could recognize — just as a beard or scroll would have demonstrated learnedness, Harley told Live Science. “They see that person holding the object and they can understand,” Harley said, “The staff is a sign of his authority.”
Originally published on Live Science.