Website Worth Calculatorsiteprice.org domain valuewebsite worth domain value Leftist ‘human rights’ orgs enraged at ‘Islamophobia’ of chief of ‘counter-extremism scheme’ overview - Flowing News

Leftist ‘human rights’ orgs enraged at ‘Islamophobia’ of chief of ‘counter-extremism scheme’ overview


The one instance of William Shawcross’ “Islamophobia” that the far-left Impartial’s appalling Lizzie Dearden provides us is that this: “Europe and Islam is likely one of the best, most terrifying issues of our future, I believe. All European international locations have vastly, in a short time rising Islamic populations and frighteningly massive numbers of the younger males in these, each in Britain and in Germany and in France, are turning to radical Islamism.”

It might be fascinating to know what a part of that assertion that Lizzie Dearden, or the Impartial’s high canines, or Amnesty Worldwide and Liberty, or Large Brother Watch, Rights and Safety Worldwide and The Runnymede Belief suppose is fake or inaccurate about that. It’s seemingly that they’re enraged at Shawcross as a result of he stated Europe and Islam constituted a “drawback,” and famous that “all European international locations have vastly, in a short time rising Islamic populations” as if that will not be an unalloyed profit to these international locations. Dearden, as a leftist “journalist” with extra curiosity in preserving the leftist narrative than reporting the reality, virtually definitely has no thought of the 1,400-year Islamic jihad towards Europe, which The Historical past of Jihad discusses intimately, and her head is probably going full of ahistorical nonsense about tolerant, pluralistic Muslim Spain, a delusion that can also be exploded in The Historical past of Jihad. However what’s the excuse of Amnesty Worldwide and these different teams? In fact, they’re all staffed with hordes of earnest younger ideologues similar to Lizzie Dearden who haven’t any clue of what they’re coping with.

The Impartial, or any of those “human rights organizations,” would have carried out us all a service if that they had defined precisely what was so egregious about what Shawcross stated. However they’ll by no means do this. The proles’ function is to simply accept the narrative, to not purpose why.

“Assessment of counter-extremism scheme boycotted over chair’s ‘Islamophobic’ feedback,” by Lizzie Dearden, Impartial, February 17, 2021:

Human rights organisations have boycotted a overview of the federal government’s flagship counter-extremism scheme after its chief was accused of Islamophobia.

Charities together with Amnesty Worldwide and Liberty stated the appointment of Wiliam [sic] Shawcross, former chair of the Charity Fee, because the impartial reviewer of Forestall had undermined its credibility.

A joint assertion accused Mr Shawcross of expressing “patently Islamophobic views” prior to now, together with saying: “Europe and Islam is likely one of the best, most terrifying issues of our future.”

The 17 teams, which additionally embody Large Brother Watch, Rights and Safety Worldwide and The Runnymede Belief, stated they might be launching their very own “parallel overview”.

“It’s obvious that the federal government intends to make use of this overview to whitewash the technique and provides it a clear invoice of well being, with out interrogating, in good religion, its impacts on human rights and elementary freedoms,” the assertion added.

Ministers introduced an impartial overview of Forestall two years in the past, nevertheless it has been beset by controversy and delays….

Human rights organisations pointed to an look on the 2012 World Affairs Council, in Texas, the place throughout a dialog about terror plots, Mr Shawcross stated: “Europe and Islam is likely one of the best, most terrifying issues of our future, I believe.

“All European international locations have vastly, in a short time rising Islamic populations and frighteningly massive numbers of the younger males in these, each in Britain and in Germany and in France, are turning to radical Islamism.”…

The group of charities stated the selection of reviewer prompt that the federal government “has little interest in conducting an goal and neutral overview of the technique, nor in participating meaningfully with communities affected by it”.

“Mr Shawcross’s appointment, given his well-known document and former statements on Islam, and following the debacle of the Lord Carlile appointment, brings into query the nice religion of the federal government in establishing the overview and essentially undermines its credibility,” they added….

Some marketing campaign teams have lengthy accused Forestall of concentrating on Muslims and setting the barrier for intervention too low, though police say statistics show that each one demographics and ideologies are thought-about….

A Dwelling Workplace spokesperson stated:…“It’s false and disingenuous to say that Forestall disproportionately targets Muslims. It performs an important function in stopping susceptible folks being drawn into all types of terrorism, with safeguarding at its coronary heart. It is vital that this overview is performed so this important programme continues to enhance.”…

Round 1 / 4 of referrals had been as a result of issues over Islamist radicalisation and 22 per cent associated to right-wing radicalisation….

Leave a Comment

x
%d bloggers like this: